July 2009

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Best Casino Dealer School Ontario

particles and particles zig zag

The beauty of these privileged intelligences, like Penrose, is that even overwhelm us with their math and language of the Cosmos ( http://paracabarconelmundo.blogspot.com/2009 / 07/la-verdad-es-que-acojona-o-te-desovaria.html ), we offer totally unexpected views of the Cosmos. The example in chapter 25 of his book "The Road to Reality." Talk of the equation Dirac for the electron and the unexpected that can draw from it in the form of the famous and not antimatter, but of matter itself as two different faces within the face material. Says "The Dirac electron can be regarded as composed of two ingredients. You can get a kind of physical interpretation of these ingredients. We formed a picture in which there are two" particles ", one described by A and the other by B, both massless, and where each is continuously developing in the other .... where the forward movement of the zig is changing continuously in the backward movement of the zag and vice versa. In fact, this is a realization of the phenomenon known as zitterbewegung. According to him, the measure of the instantaneous movement of the electron is always the speed of light ... "
Removed
that which everything is reduced to movement end, mechanics, according to physics, this is a lovely idea of not only see antimatter in equational treatment of the entities that seem to build and tend all to a schizophrenic division thereof, see, for example, the electron as two indivisible elements, called zig and zag named in honor of the wave motion in which "zig particle acts as a source of particle zag and vice versa. later asked something so great: "raise the issue of whether these particles zig and zag are or are not" real "Or maybe you are just artifacts of the particular mathematical formalism that have been taken here to describe the Dirac equation for the electron? This raises a question More generally, what is physically justified to allow a display driven by the mathematical elegance of some description and then try to consider that this description corresponds to reality? " (aside how I feel about the "elegance" in general, especially in math. Elegance is that part of the aesthetic that commutes with makeup beauty by ugliness or awkwardness truth) Superb question "What physical justification is to allow one to look drawn by the elegance of a certain mathematical description and then try to consider that this description corresponds to reality?".

And great description for me, considering that the electron two, maybe they are, and not just two but three or something, thus overcoming the quarks, three, comprising the nucleons? (Although in the nucleons is or are so many things, "particles" that are transformed into each other like a crazy costume party) The particle zig zag particle ... and more and more besides that another. I have to climb to one of my journals that idea must walk through my notebooks which set out that the electrons seen as composed of the 3.4 "body", "particles" much more basic, or protons and neutrons, by 529 and some entities of the same ... since so many "things" inside of a proton or neutron, quarks, gluons, which are transmuted into each other, which are very briefly other hadrons ... so still dancing for ever, and how stable are eternal or protons (anger of many who want to see them broken up, although it may take time to do longer life than the universe itself is, on top of successes of the standard theory)

Me Like, I've said, that the electron zig-zag. But what disgusts me, and I have said, is that mechanical treatment given to the entire movement. Being, energy, seen as nothing but movement. Says in Chapter 22.12 in the same book Penrose: "The notions of energy and momentum quantum mysteriously represent or are (essentially) - generators of translation movements of space-time and space." And when I see so treated energy, I can not remember the words Papini Einstein put into the mouth of summarizing all the knowledge of the world turn to physical knowledge synthesis: "Something is moving" . That is the brief summary of all our knowledge. The moves and all notions of translations, rotations, moments. I just see blood

Saturday, July 11, 2009

Auctions Fredericton Nb

Penrose was going to say what I always thought Alexaindre our poet laureate, to Following a few words spoken by him who does not know or do know:

Semipoetas said of those to whom life had played such a strange pass to give them a total vocation to write poetry but not the necessary powers to do so.

was going to say, and yes I'll say what I always thought or felt to face one of his poems: I seemed to hear the bad of any political discourse where many words are poured and nothing came to be said nonetheless.

But I'll do something better, now that I reread some of his poems here on the net and we do not seem so empty, although I still seem so unmusical, so no rhythm, so that mean no real life, passion of the bowels, even to be called "Sex" his poems, or "love" of they were. I put this fragmentito as presents:
Oh, beautiful combination of blood and bloom,
secret button in the light perfume
the birth of light
growing between the thighs of a beautiful pitch. Ruda
currency or sun exhales
born on that aching body,
ready to love when the peak push the opponent
aggressive advances. Mystery

fiery sunset time when, as in the ray touch enter
into the chasm and become voracious night
perfect night for lovers ;
and then as I sing story see:
beautiful combination of flower and
blood ("blood can be my roses?
I see no other beautiful conjunction, or even planetary)
secret button
light or light scented perfume, born
the growth of light between her thighs ...
can be of fine pitch, cut flowers, flower deflowered
if not in his bed,
you are no longer in your branch
if you planted it in the pot cot
the maker of verse as if husking a political speech
those without content and pace
consist only repeat same,
and now, as we talk about poets, gardeners
and not congress, parliament, etc, repeating the same words
corny
a poetic meanings misshapen,
as worthless buzzwords
like everything artificial.
"achy" and they miss the ass, I mean that's
the candy makers pizarnikianos,
with ass in the air when the volcano wake of the tongue
burp or erections so that you can not hide
for failure of many Freuds.
"The enemy aggressively forward."
So many are those who confuse aggression with passion, and we see
poets, all.
lightning in fierce pit enter.
trampled light
as it seems that the "lovers" prefer the unknown night,
of foreplay and to another body, another morning ....
also become night.

Amen. Would deprive the friend
only prepositions and other ugly buildings its rows ...
But her aunt remove them or their heirs.
At last I am myself and I said what I had to say. Surely it's

"semipoeta" he said of himself, as many think it is "semi-shoulder," but not daring to express it. Certainly not we are, we were not, before that ray that continues the great English poetry, the one that put his hand up pretending Beyond remove the dead from the grave as Hernandez, Pizarnik, although they were dead at the end, we, and no one to resurrect us. Without anyone to commit to the death your hand to shoulder to introduce it into the bowels of the night, the other night. That night itself consumes all the bodies and souls of all true lovers and / or poets.

an inescapable calling of writing poetry as well if they gave him life, which in Alberti, like so many, but in reality nothing of poetry ... or nothing. I see only

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Congratulation On Sobriety

highest bidder is started in the cold in vacuum in an oven unimaginable in a hot spot with everything inside. Moreover legal vacuum that Einstein and his

, uniqueness of the principle. ALSO IF THAT IS STILL EMPTY, ESA vacuum energy or dark energy 73% IN THE UNIVERSE.

course is huge (the larger universe is not expanding http://soloveorosas2.blogspot.com/2008/10/el-universo-es-grande-no-se-expande.html ) and young Despite the infinite: 73% of what still can be or has been manifested. We have a universe to finish only 27% of it. "Finished? If you can say "finished" with 26% of what stirs in him and know that it is and it is known as dark mass. It also, dark mass, a game with as ignore both, 99% of what we observe or not observe or technology and our eyes met, say, at the time of the first galaxies, edge of the universe.

we say that began in the void, in that immense disgust still evident, in that place non-place (or yes-place. If you do not understand the mass, do we understand space? If you do not understand the contents have we understood the container?) where everything is infinite according to the quantum, where everything is, where all can come, any particle, any number of them, enough to make the relevant traps over time, that there is enough time for everything and emerge no longer return to the status prior to the calendar, as the same arise, come all, opens the chronology .... And that arise
all well, it's no explosion, no hot spot. Everything comes from cold, better, lack thereof, in the absence of any temperature.
And then we have them here, time, temperature, friction. Here we have a re-arranged everything according to the calendar and thermometer, there we have the content and the mainland.
But that is something that still allows our tamposa quantum, especially if we have an empty 73% of all such licenses creations.

The world could start like this, being still thus creating still, not as the hackneyed verse that tell of explosions.

Leo in one of those publications that has been saving over time with regard not only to interest but of interest to the rest of humanity: "What far astronomy has confirmed." We note that confirmations are all filled with errors, a thousand-odd years of "confirmations" devoted to Ptolemy, for example. For what astronomy was confirmed according to this publication, was, is, that the universe is flat. He says: "While the matter can bend space locally, and provides the general theory of relativity of Einstein, on a larger scale the universe is flat, that is, he always maintained two parallel lines the same distance between their points. "
Well not seem to greatly affect the flatness of the theories turned into laws governing physics as they continue assuming done what the universe is curved, what a silly extrapolation of Einstein made the subject to the same space. Seeing that all the bodies in it tend to these curves, as the space where the elastic material that floats or falls or is also be curved or rounded, whether out of empathy with what it contains.

zero point energy, which is not zero as you might think the point that not everything stops moving there, but it seems there a movement, a being that preceded that move now and only have inherited what is now displayed. It is in understanding the quantum vacuum where everything is, where all the explanations for the same, all to all. Quantum is in the understanding of everything now and there is wine, which will explain the origins and thus what may be matter-energy space-time. That devilish temperature to be breaking the barriers that lead to the majestic, it was too dynamic time, the light speed celere also show us where he gets the "fuel" that makes it so fast, not a very different to the majestic.

NOTHING IS STILL more quickly than ESA. And quiet does not mean to be dead, or lack of movement finish which ... Is everything over? What words pronounced very different now Newton to be this time. He thought that all tended to rest as the cosmic cemetery ... or ocean, or cemeteries dark cosmic ocean, and God's hand pulled back to get things moving, the watchmaker god. Eliminating the word "God" without meaning, and put in place "The". The much we know it remains a mystery despite all that we have discovered.

I read somewhere that there are so energetic neutrinos can reach the mass in eV estimated for the famous Higgs boson (for himself and others), mass around which I give to my beloved and magical Alpha, Aleph, no cores Rutherford: 10 ^{12 eV} 1/2ε or α. They neutrinos are mass-energy October 1 -9 of the electron, something like the mass energy that could be, and is, a degree of heat K, much colder than the Cosmos which comes to background radiation be a somewhat higher grade.
If even a neutrino can be displayed using the appropriate power, as a whole Aleph, Alpha, higgs boson, what will not be able to vacuum a lot more nothing to the neutrino, as messenger appears to be and is there if we put all the veils of big-bang big explosions, infinitesimal and infinitely dense points which should say everything.
say, they say. What do you say tomorrow? I like to hear it, even if no longer here. But I'll find out, we'll find out, wherever you are, wherever we are, there's no doubt. I just see blood